Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Nearly 10 years have passed since Sarah Connor was targeted for termination by a cyborg from the future. Now her son John the future leader of the resistance is the target for a newer more deadly terminator. Once again the resistance has managed to send a protector back to attempt to save John and his mother Sarah.

Review

Who said sequels arent any good "Terminator 2" is the ultimate sequel a big bad wolf ready to chomp the head off of anyone who crosses its path. Its dark its mean and its one tough movie. Its not as bleak as the first film at least in terms of visuals but rather has a new kind of bluishtint that supplies a great backdrop to the ongoing battle between man and machine.

If there was ever a contemporary mainstream visionary director it is James Cameron. Here weve got Camerons real thoughts on the series those repressed by a low budget in the original film. He lets loose here filling every frame with hardboiled action and special effects. He introduces a liquid metal Terminator that he wanted to use in the first film but graphic processors and CGI were not advanced enough in 1984 at least not advanced enough to work on the low means he had to film the original. So his original dream is finally unveiled and good golly gee Molly is it wonderful.

Yeah hes "back." Arnold (like he needs any introduction) returns as The Terminator Series T101 Model T800 an indestructible cyborg sent from the future to assassinate Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) in the first film. Well its 1991. New film. New mission. He has to save the future resistance leader of mankind who will ultimately defeat the machines of the future John Connor (Edward Furlong) Sarahs 11yearold son. (Though his age has been switched from 11 to 13 and back to 9 over the years with no help from the third film that takes place in 2003 yet claims he was 13 in 1991 though his age doesnt match with his age in the third. Well just leave it at 11 in this film. Got that)

Another model Terminator the T1000 (Robert Patrick) has been sent back to 1991 programmed to annihilate John Connor. Which explains Arnolds appearance. Arnold an undoubtedly lesser opponent compared to the T1000 has to help save the day and learn to appreciate humanity. It wont be easy. First he has to find John Connor who is a rebellious angstdriven preteen living with foster parents. Then together they have to break into the local loony hospital and release Sarah from the clutches of Dr. Silberman (Earl Boen) who believes Sarah is delusional. (You may remember Silberman as the psychiatrist from the first film too.) Then they have to stop a computer chip designer (Joe Morton) from creating the first version of a SkyNet computer modeled after a destroyed chip his employment company discovered at a large mechanical warehouse. (Which is of course the chip from the destroyed T800 of the first film.)

Whew. On with the film analysis right Where to start This isnt as fierce or brutal as the first film but its got plentiful action sequences a large budget great special effects (even compared to those gracing the screen nowadays) not to mention a great character study of the machine we loved to root against in the first film. Of course this Terminator has no memory of the first film since he wasnt in itSkyNet creates hordes of the same version machines on a large conveyor belt and ships them off to fight in the war. Some are sent back through time. So with that in mind John Connors resistance found an extra Arnold lying around in an abandoned warehouse programmed him to keep John Connor out of harm and sent him through the time portal.

Sarah doesnt trust him. In a deleted scene available on the Ultimate and "Xtreme" edition DVDs Sarah says "You dont know what its like to try and kill one of these things!" Its an important scene that should have been left in the final cut. In it Sarah is about to destroy the machines central processing chip located inside his head when John stops her. Its important because it focuses on the fact that Sarah still doesnt trust him and came close to destroying him purely out of prejudice without giving him a chance. As much as I dont like it when people go on about hidden meanings in films that obviously are not meant to have hidden meanings and are purely little flubs made by directors unrightfully analyzed for deeper meaning(s) "T2" clearly has an underlying message One dont judge a book by its cover. Read it first. Two if an emotionless killing machine can learn to appreciate life why cant everyone And three the most important fact of all Never mess with a muscular man who walks into a bar completely naked and requests your clothes and means of transportation.

I suppose the question on most interested viewers minds is this Is "T2 Judgment Day" better than its predecessor Well in some respects yes. In others no. It lacks the fierce brutality and darkness of the first film but makes up for it with spectacular visual effects and action sequences. It lacks the horrific central focus of the first film (futuristic indestructible cyborgs with no feelings being able to unemotionally kill) but it makes up for this with a new focus of humanity coming to accept your future and how it would look if two colossal killing machines entered into an arena together.

In some ways I like the first better. But then I think about the second film and I have a hard time choosing. I suppose if I had to choose Id choose the first film. And let me just state for the record that Im glad I dont have to choose.

55 stars.